ABSTRACT
Introduction: Hip fractures in the elderly have represented a major public health concern. Studies have shown that over 90% of the patients having these fractures are people of more than 50 years. These fractures have been classified according to their anatomical location into the neck of femur fracture, intertrochanteric fracture, and subtrochanteric fracture. The neck of femur fractures is associated with high mortality in the elderly compared to young adults. Surgical treatment is an established gold standard, with the option being osteosynthesis and hip replacement. Hemiarthroplasty is one of the gold-standard treatments chosen for the geriatric age group and has yielded universally acceptable results. Materials and Methods: The study evaluates the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly with fracture neck of the femur Data of patients above 60 years who were operated on for fracture neck of the femur by bipolar hemiarthroplasty from May 2018 till December 2021were retrieved from the Medical Records Department of SCL Municipal General Hospital, affiliated to NHL Municipal medical college. The patients fitting the inclusion criteria were selected for the study. The sample size was calculated to be 43. Data were collected from the inpatient files, and then patients were asked to complete the questionnaire form during the final follow- up. All the patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically during the follow-up, and the functional outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score. Thirty-five patients had a domestic fall as the mode of injury. The lateral decubitus position of all patients was used during the operation that was performed using the Southern Moore approach. Forty patients received cemented femoral stems; the remaining three received press-fit ones. Results: The average age was calculated to be 71.86 years with the male-to-female ratio of 1: 1.15 with an average follow-up of 12.7 months. Eight patients had acetabular erosion at the end of 1 year. There was no femoral stem malalignment or aseptic loosening at the final follow-up. Nine patients had excellent Harris Hip scores, and five had fair scores. The remaining 29 patients had good Harris hip scores. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty has served us well in the study. Forty-one patients were able to get back to their preinjury functional level. Only one patient reported major pain in the hip at the final follow-up. In this study, there was no incidence of dislocation or revision surgeries. Conclusion: The present study modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty provides better pain relief with early mobilization and a good level of return to daily routine activities with minimal complications.
ABSTRACT
Background and objectives: Incisional hernia is the one true iatrogenic hernia. The Incisional hernia occurs in less than 5-11% of patients subjected to abdominal operation. Incisional hernia usually starts within few months after surgery, as a result of failure of the lines of closure of the abdominal wall following laparotomy. If left unattended they tend to attain large size and cause discomfort to the patient. This study has been undertaken to assess the magnitude of this problem, various factors leading to development of this condition and the different modalities of treatment practiced in our set up. Methodology: The present study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery; AMC MET Medical college and Seth L. G. Hospital Ahmedabad, in which 60 patients of incisional hernia were treated during June 2018 to April 2020. Interpretation and Conclusion: Successful repair relies on knowledge of the dynamics of the abdominal wall, thorough technical execution, appropriate selection of synthetic or bioprosthetic material, and constitution of surgical team. Though laparoscopic repair has been demonstrated to be safe and a more resilient repair than open repair, open mesh repair remains a suitable alternative.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective : Blunt abdominal injury remains one of the commonest injuries. The solid organs, namely the Liver, Spleen & Kidney are the most commonly injured intra-abdominal organs. Non operative line of management is now considered the line of treatment for patients with intra-abdominal organ injury who are hemodynamically stable. In the case of polytraumatized patients with open or blunt abdominal trauma, the liver is the most frequently injured abdominal organ. Earlier, surgical treatment was the standard procedure globally for all kinds of trauma-related liver injuries. However, development of new interventional radiological techniques has changed the paradigm towards a non-surgical patient management. Methodology: An observational study of 50 patients with solid organ injuries of the abdomen following abdominal trauma admitted over a period from July 2018 up to August 2020 was carried out. Patient management either operative or conservative was decided on basis of hemodynamic status and they were divided in groups OP (Operated) and NOM (Non Operative Management). Interpretation and conclusion : In our study, majority of liver injury were treated conservatively. Splenic injury patients were mostly managed by operative intervention and renal injury patients were managed according to grading of organ injury.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective : Common bile duct stone typically requires surgical intervention, which primarily involves open CBD exploration + Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic CBD exploration. Open CBD exploration has multiple complications, high mortality rate and long recovery time. Methodology : A total of 50 cases presenting as choledocholithiasis between July 2018 to August 2020 were taken for study. 1st group of 20 patients underwent open cholecystectomy with open CBD exploration. 2nd group of 20 patients underwent ERCP followed by interval (6 weeks) laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results : ERCP found to be better when compared with open CBD exploration in terms of less post-operative complications (5% in ERCP vs 20% in Open CBD exploration) and less mean duration of hospital stay(5 days in ERCP vs 8 days in Open CBD exploration). Interpretation and Conclusion : For management of CBD stone patient, gold standard treatment is ERCP followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. While in patients with incomplete clearance of CBD stone after ERCP, CBD exploration either laparoscopically or by open approach should be preferred. While in patients with CBD stone greater than 2 cm size, direct open CBD exploration is the preferred option380008